Translate this page into:
Assessment of the anticancer and antioxidant potentials of Spinosaurus tooth fossils: Application of energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence and field emission scanning electron microscopy techniques
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Malhotra Y. Assessment of the anticancer and antioxidant potentials of Spinosaurus tooth fossils: Application of energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence and field emission scanning electron microscopy techniques. Am J Biopharm Pharm Sci. 2026;6:11. doi: 10.25259/AJBPS_7RES_2026
Abstract
Objectives:
The study was undertaken to investigate the elemental composition, microstructural characteristics, anticancer activity, and antioxidant-related potential of fossilized Spinosaurus tooth material using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (ED-XRF), gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium (MTT) cytotoxicity assay, and intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) analysis. The work aimed to determine whether fossilized Spinosaurus tooth material, beyond its paleontological value, may also represent a mineralized bioactive matrix with potential relevance to cancer-related biological research.
Materials and Methods:
An authenticated fossilized Spinosaurus tooth specimen obtained from the Fossil Era was examined by camera imaging and binocular microscopy and then subjected to FESEM imaging, EDS, and ED-XRF elemental analysis. The fossil was powdered and extracted using ethanol-water (70:30), and the resulting extract was analyzed by GC-MS to identify potentially bioactive compounds. Anticancer activity was evaluated against the MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cell line using the MTT assay, while intracellular ROS generation was assessed using 2’,7’-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate fluorescence staining. Cell viability, IC50 values, and ROS fluorescence responses were interpreted in relation to the fossil’s mineral and chemical composition.
Results:
FESEM-EDS and ED-XRF analyses revealed that the fossilized tooth consisted of a highly mineralized matrix enriched with oxygen, calcium, phosphorus, silicon, iron, magnesium, manganese, carbon, and additional trace elements. FESEM–EDS of the upper tooth region showed oxygen (69.16 wt%), carbon (12.96 wt%), iron (7.39 wt%), magnesium (0.49 wt%), and manganese (0.21 wt%), indicating the presence of redox-active and apatite-associated phases. GC-MS profiling identified several compounds, including anthraquinone-related molecules, pyrrole derivatives, aromatic esters, sulfur-containing compounds, and iron-associated organometallic complexes. In vitro cytotoxicity studies demonstrated concentration-dependent inhibition of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, with an IC50 value of 72.67 µg/mL. Intracellular ROS fluorescence analysis further indicated increased oxidative stress in treated cells.
Conclusion:
The findings suggest that fossilized Spinosaurus tooth material represents a chemically complex mineralized bio-composite with measurable in vitro anticancer and oxidative stress-modulating activity. The observed effects may arise from the synergistic interaction of redox-active trace elements and fossil-associated organic constituents. Although preliminary and requiring further mechanistic, toxicological, and in vivo validation, the present study establishes an interdisciplinary foundation for exploring fossil-derived biomineral materials in anticancer and antioxidant research.
Keywords
Spinosaurus Fossil tooth
Spinosaurus anticancer activity
Spinosaurus antioxidant activity
Biomineralization
Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence
Field emission scanning electron microscope
Gas chromatography
mass spectrometry
M. D. Anderson series of breast cancer cell lines- MDA-MB 231
oxidative stress and natural products
fossil nutraceuticals and biopharmaceuticals
INTRODUCTION
The fossil record provides an extraordinary archive of biological evolution, ancient ecosystems, and long-term geochemical transformation. Fossils are traditionally studied in the context of palaeontology, evolutionary biology, stratigraphy, and sedimentary geology; however, in recent years, fossilized materials have begun to attract attention in broader interdisciplinary fields, including biomaterials science, geochemistry, nanomedicine, and natural product-inspired therapeutic research. Fossilized hard tissues such as teeth, bones, shells, and mineralized plant remains are especially intriguing because they preserve not only morphological information, but also complex mineral signatures generated through long-term diagenetic processes. These mineral signatures may contain redox-active metals, apatite phases, silicates, carbon-bearing residues, and trace compounds capable of interacting with biological systems in unconventional ways.
Among the most iconic fossil vertebrates, Spinosaurus occupies a unique place in paleontological research. Spinosaurus was a giant theropod dinosaur that lived during the Late Cretaceous period, approximately 99–93.5 million years ago, in fluvial and coastal ecosystems of North Africa, particularly regions corresponding to present-day Morocco and Egypt.[1,2] It is widely regarded as one of the largest carnivorous dinosaurs ever discovered and is distinguished by an elongated crocodile-like skull, conical non-serrated teeth, posteriorly positioned nostrils, and postcranial adaptations suggestive of semiaquatic or aquatic foraging behavior.[3-6] Isolated Spinosaurus teeth are among the most frequently recovered fossils from the Kem-Kem Group of Morocco and related North African fossil-bearing deposits, and they have played a major role in reconstructing feeding ecology, habitat preference, and theropod diversity.[7,8]
The tooth of Spinosaurus is of particular interest because of its distinctive structure and ecological function. Unlike the laterally compressed, blade-like teeth of many theropod dinosaurs, Spinosaurus teeth are generally conical, robust, and adapted for grasping slippery prey such as fish. During life, these teeth were composed of enamel, dentine, and internal structural tissues, but over millions of years, fossilization transformed them into mineralized geological specimens. The process of fossilization is not a passive preservation event; rather, it involves a series of physicochemical transformations such as permineralization, replacement, recrystallization, oxidation, and sedimentary mineral incorporation. As a result, fossilized teeth may retain a biomimetic architecture while also becoming enriched with diverse mineral phases and trace elements derived from the burial environment. The gross morphology of the authenticated fossilized Spinosaurus tooth used in the present study is shown in Figure 1. Representative binocular microscopic images of the fossilized Spinosaurus tooth are presented in Figure 2.


This geochemical transformation raises an important scientific question: can fossilized tooth material, after extensive diagenesis, display biologically relevant properties when processed as an extract or mineral preparation? Trace elements such as iron, manganese, magnesium, calcium, phosphorus, silicon, and associated oxygen-containing mineral phases are known to participate in redox reactions, catalytic behavior, ion exchange, and oxidative stress-related pathways in living systems. Iron and manganese, for example, can influence the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), while calcium-rich phosphate phases may affect cellular signaling and apoptosis-related pathways.[9-15] From a biomaterials perspective, fossilized mineral composites could therefore serve as unusual natural matrices capable of interacting with cells through oxidative, ionic, or surface-mediated mechanisms.
Breast cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality among women worldwide. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) presents a major therapeutic challenge because it lacks estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression, limiting the availability of targeted treatment options. The MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cell line is a widely used in vitro model of aggressive and invasive TNBC and is frequently employed to screen novel compounds, natural products, metal-based agents, and biomaterials for anticancer potential. Cytotoxicity assays such as the 3-(4,5-diemethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium (MTT) assay provide an initial measure of growth inhibition, while ROS-based assays offer mechanistic insight into oxidative stress-mediated pathways of cell injury and apoptosis.[16-19]
ROS play a dual role in cancer biology. At controlled levels, ROS function as signaling molecules involved in proliferation, migration, and metabolic adaptation. However, excessive ROS accumulation can induce oxidative damage to DNA, proteins, and lipids, disrupt mitochondrial membrane potential, activate stress signaling cascades, and trigger apoptotic or necrotic cell death. Because many anticancer strategies rely on elevating ROS beyond the tolerance threshold of cancer cells, materials capable of modulating intracellular oxidative stress are of particular interest in cancer research.[20,21]
In parallel with the biological significance of oxidative stress, the chemical complexity of fossil-derived materials warrants analytical investigation. Modern characterization tools such as Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (ED-XRF) allow detailed examination of fossil microstructure and elemental composition, while gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) can identify extractable organic and semi-volatile compounds associated with fossil matrices. These approaches provide an opportunity to connect paleontological specimens with biomaterial-like properties and to examine whether ancient, mineralized tissues may contain molecular or elemental features relevant to cellular bioactivity.
The present study was therefore designed to assess the anticancer and antioxidant-related potential of a fossilized Spinosaurus tooth specimen through an integrated analytical and biological workflow. The fossil was morphologically documented and characterized using FESEM, EDS, and ED-XRF to determine its microstructure and elemental composition. An ethanol–water extract of the powdered fossil was analyzed by GC-MS to identify putative bioactive constituents. The extract was then evaluated for cytotoxicity against MDA MB 231 human breast cancer cells using the MTT assay, and intracellular ROS generation was assessed by 2’,7’-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFHDA) fluorescence staining. By combining palaeontology, geochemistry, analytical chemistry, and cancer cell biology, this study explores the possibility that fossilized Spinosaurus tooth material may represent a mineralized bioactive composite of interdisciplinary biomedical interest.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fossil specimen acquisition
A fossilized Spinosaurus tooth specimen was obtained from the Fossil Era and was accompanied by a certificate of authenticity. The specimen was procured from Mr. Matt Heaton, CEO of Fossil Era. Before analytical and biological evaluation, the fossil was visually documented and preserved under standard dry conditions.
Geological and specimen context
The specimen originated from Moroccan fossil-bearing deposits associated with Spinosaurus-rich strata. Such localities are known for yielding abundant isolated theropod teeth and vertebrate remains from the Kem-Kem group and related Cretaceous formations. Fossils from these regions are typically identified through geological survey, excavation, sedimentological documentation, fossil recognition, preparation, and paleontological authentication. The specimen used in the present study was obtained through authenticated legal commercial channels.
Morphological examination
The fossilized tooth was examined macroscopically and by binocular microscopy. Camera images were recorded to document gross morphology, external contours, and surface preservation. Binocular microscopic observations were performed using the EuroMaxAlpha system to study fine surface details, preserved texture, mineral deposition patterns, and wear-related features.
FESEM imaging and EDS elemental analysis
FESEM was used to obtain high-resolution micrographs of the fossil surface. FESEM enabled examination of the microstructural organization of the fossilized tooth, including mineralized layers, surface threads, pores, and preserved textural features. Simultaneously, EDS was carried out to determine the elemental composition of selected regions of the fossil surface. The microstructural characteristics of the fossilized tooth observed by FESEM are shown in Figure 3.

Powder preparation and ED-XRF analysis
For bulk elemental analysis, the fossilized tooth was carefully ground into fine powder using a mortar and pestle under clean laboratory conditions. The powdered material was subjected to ED-XRF analysis to identify and quantify major and trace elements associated with fossil mineralization.
Extraction of fossil powder
Ten grams of powdered fossil material were extracted with 100 mL of ethanol–water (70:30, v/v) under reflux at 60°C for 6 h. After extraction, the mixture was filtered, concentrated under reduced pressure, and lyophilized to obtain a brownish extractive fraction (yield: 2.8 g). The dried extract was used for GC-MS analysis and in vitro cell-based assays.
GC-MS analysis
The lyophilized fossil extract was subjected to GC-MS to identify extractable volatile and semi-volatile compounds. Chromatographic peaks, retention times, and major molecular assignments were recorded. Identified compounds were interpreted in relation to previously reported chemical classes associated with oxidative stress modulation, apoptosis induction, and anticancer activity.
Cell line and culture conditions
The human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231(MD Anderson-Metastatic Breast-231) was obtained from NCCS, Pune, India. Cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 µg/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin. Cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
MTT cytotoxicity assay
The cytotoxic effect of the fossil extract on MDAMB-231 cells was evaluated using the MTT assay according to standard procedures.[16,17]
Procedure
MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells/mL and incubated overnight.
Cells were washed with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and treated with different concentrations of the test sample prepared in serum-free DMEM.
Each concentration was tested in triplicate, and the plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in 5% CO2.
MTT solution (20 µL, 5 mg/mL) was added to each well and incubated for 4 h to allow formazan crystal formation.
The medium was discarded, wells were washed with PBS, and the crystals were dissolved in 100 µL dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).
Absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).
Cell viability was calculated using the following formula:
Cell viability (%) = (Test optical density [OD]/Control OD) × 100
IC50 values were calculated using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software.
Intracellular ROS determination
Intracellular ROS generation was measured using the DCFHDA fluorescence assay.[18,19]
Procedure
MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded in six-well plates at a density of 1 × 105 cells/well and incubated overnight.
The medium was replaced with fresh medium containing the test sample and incubated for 24 h.
Cells were stained with DCFH-DA for 30 min in the dark.
Fluorescence microscopy was performed using a Floid imaging station (Life Technologies, USA).
Images were captured at 20 × magnification with a scale bar of 125 µm.
Data analysis
Data obtained from FESEM, EDS, ED-XRF, GC-MS, MTT assay, and ROS analysis were compiled and interpreted in relation to the fossil’s chemical composition and biological activity. MTT assay readings were obtained in triplicate, and IC50 values were calculated from the dose–response curve.
RESULTS
Morphological characteristics of the fossilized tooth
The fossilized Spinosaurus tooth retained a well-preserved external morphology consistent with theropod dental architecture. Camera imaging showed the overall conical form and preserved crown-like structure of the specimen, while binocular microscopy revealed textural variations, mineralized surface details, and fossil wear patterns.
FESEM microstructural analysis
FESEM examination revealed a highly mineralized and structurally heterogeneous surface architecture in the fossilized Spinosaurus tooth. The micrographs showed irregular layered deposits, thread-like mineral accretions, compact mineralized patches, and localized porous or fractured regions, indicating extensive diagenetic modification of the original dental tissue. Variations in surface texture across the imaged regions suggest that the fossil is compositionally non-uniform and consists of a complex mineral matrix rather than a simple preserved hard tissue surface. These microstructural features are consistent with long-term fossilization processes involving mineral replacement, recrystallization, sediment-associated deposition, and progressive incorporation of inorganic phases into the tooth matrix.
FESEM-EDS elemental analysis
The FESEM-EDS spectrum demonstrated that the fossil surface contained a complex elemental composition. The upper tooth region was dominated by oxygen-rich mineral phases with additional contributions from carbon, iron, magnesium, manganese, silicon, aluminum, and apatite-associated mineral constituents.
The FESEM-EDS analysis of the fossilized Spinosaurus tooth demonstrated a predominantly oxygen-rich mineralized surface, with oxygen accounting for 69.16 wt% of the detected elemental composition. Carbon was the next most abundant element at 12.96 wt%, followed by iron at 7.39 wt%, while magnesium and manganese were present in smaller amounts at 0.49 wt% and 0.21 wt%, respectively. The high oxygen content is consistent with the presence of oxidized and phosphate-associated mineral phases within the fossil matrix, whereas the detection of iron, magnesium, and manganese indicates incorporation of trace metal-bearing mineral components during fossilization. Overall, the FESEM-EDS profile supports the view that the tooth surface has undergone substantial geochemical transformation and now exists as a heterogeneous biomineral composite enriched with both major and trace elements.
Calcium and phosphorus were also represented within the apatite-derived fossil matrix, while silicon and aluminum suggested silicified and sediment-associated mineral phases. Collectively, the FESEM EDS data indicate that the fossilized tooth surface is a chemically complex metal–mineral composite rather than a simple preserved hard tissue.
The spectrum demonstrates a highly mineralized and chemically heterogeneous fossil surface dominated by oxygen, with additional contributions from carbon, iron, magnesium, and manganese. Calcium and phosphorus indicate apatite-associated mineral phases, whereas silicon and aluminum suggest sediment-derived and silicified components incorporated during fossilization. The elemental profile supports substantial diagenetic alteration of the original tooth tissue. The corresponding FESEM–EDS spectrum is presented in Figure 4. The quantitative elemental composition determined by FESEM–EDS is summarized in Table 1.

| Element | Weight % | MDL | Atomic % | Error % | Net Int. | R | A | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C K | 12.96 | 0.46 | 18.27 | 11.89 | 129.74 | 0.9134 | 0.0678 | 1.0000 |
| O K | 69.16 | 0.12 | 73.19 | 9.07 | 5288.63 | 0.9234 | 0.2026 | 1.0000 |
| Mg K | 0.49 | 0.05 | 0.34 | 12.33 | 74.30 | 0.9381 | 0.3163 | 1.0045 |
| Al K | 0.88 | 0.04 | 0.55 | 8.19 | 172.89 | 0.9413 | 0.4527 | 1.0074 |
| Si K | 8.77 | 0.03 | 5.29 | 5.54 | 2089.67 | 0.9443 | 0.5774 | 1.0045 |
| K K | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 17.82 | 23.32 | 0.9574 | 0.8874 | 1.0319 |
| Mn K | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 22.27 | 19.09 | 0.9705 | 0.9800 | 1.0980 |
| Fe K | 7.39 | 0.08 | 2.24 | 2.59 | 605.60 | 0.9725 | 0.9847 | 1.0637 |
Surface elemental composition of the fossilized Spinosaurus tooth as determined by FESEM-EDS analysis. The table summarizes the major and minor elements detected from the analyzed tooth region and reflects the chemically heterogeneous, oxygen-rich, and apatite-associated mineral character of the fossil surface. FESEM EDS: Field emission scanning electron microscopy energy-dispersive spectroscopy, R: Range correction factor, A: Absorption correction factor, F: Fluorescence correction factor
ED-XRF bulk elemental composition
ED-XRF analysis of the powdered fossil sample confirmed the presence of multiple major and trace elements, including calcium, phosphorus, iron, magnesium, manganese, silicon, and additional mineral constituents. The ED-XRF data supported the FESEM EDS findings and further confirmed that the fossil had undergone substantial mineralization. The coexistence of apatite-related elements with trace metals suggested that the fossil matrix could potentially support redox-active behavior and mineral-mediated biological interactions.
Figure 5 presents the ED-XRF spectrum of the powdered fossilized Spinosaurus tooth and confirms the presence of a mineral-rich bulk elemental profile. The major peaks correspond to calcium and phosphorus, indicating that apatite-derived mineral phases remain a dominant component of the fossil matrix. Additional peaks attributable to iron, magnesium, manganese, and silicon demonstrate the incorporation of trace metals and sediment-associated mineral constituents during fossilization. The coexistence of apatite-related elements with redox-active metals suggests that the tooth has undergone substantial diagenetic transformation and now exists as a chemically heterogeneous biomineral composite rather than a simple preserved dental structure. Overall, the ED-XRF data complement the FESEM–EDS findings by showing that both the tooth surface and the powdered bulk material retain a complex elemental composition of possible geochemical and biological relevance.
GC-MS analysis of fossil extract
GC-MS analysis of the ethanol–water extract revealed several compounds and molecular classes of possible biological relevance. Major peaks were detected at retention times corresponding to anthraquinone-related molecules, pyrrole derivatives, sulfur-containing compounds, aromatic esters, piperazine-associated compounds, and iron-associated organometallic complexes.
Representative compounds detected in the fossil extract included DMSO, 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid diisooctyl ester, 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester, anthraquinone-related derivatives, pyrrole-associated compounds, sulfur-containing ester derivatives, piperazine-associated compounds, and iron-associated organometallic complexes. Although these assignments require cautious interpretation in view of the fossil origin of the material, they indicate that the extract contains multiple volatile and semi-volatile constituents belonging to chemical classes previously associated with redox modulation, mitochondrial perturbation, apoptosis induction, and growth inhibitory effects in cancer-related systems.
These compounds belong to molecular classes previously associated with apoptosis induction, oxidative stress modulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, or inhibition of cancer cell growth.
Cytotoxic activity against MDA-MB-231 cells
The fossil extract exhibited concentration-dependent cytotoxicity against MDA MB 231 human breast cancer cells. The OD values recorded at different concentrations are presented in Table 2, while the corresponding cell viability percentages are shown in Table 3.
| Sr. No. | Tested sample concentration (µg/mL) |
OD value at 570 nm (in triplicates) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control | 0.241 | 0.201 | 0.236 |
| 2 | 500 µg/mL | 0.127 | 0.134 | 0.133 |
| 3 | 400 µg/mL | 0.132 | 0.147 | 0.135 |
| 4 | 300 µg/mL | 0.140 | 0.137 | 0.138 |
| 5 | 200 µg/mL | 0.143 | 0.141 | 0.141 |
| 6 | 100 µg/mL | 0.145 | 0.147 | 0.146 |
| 7 | 80 µg/mL | 0.149 | 0.161 | 0.16 |
| 8 | 60 µg/mL | 0.16 | 0.163 | 0.166 |
| 9 | 40 µg/mL | 0.172 | 0.172 | 0.176 |
| 10 | 20 µg/mL | 0.177 | 0.176 | 0.178 |
| 11 | 10 µg/mL | 0.179 | 0.20 | 0.180 |
Raw optical density values recorded at 570 nm in the MTT cytotoxicity assay following treatment of MDA-MB-231 cells with different concentrations of fossilized Spinosaurus tooth extract. Triplicate OD values are presented for each tested concentration and were used for calculation of cell viability percentages and IC50 values. OD: Optical density, MTT: 3-(4,5-diemethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
| S. No. | Tested sample concentration (µg/mL) | Cell viability (%) (Replicate 1) | Replicate 2 | Replicate 3 | Mean Value (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Control | 100.00000 | 100.00000 | 100.00000 | 100.00000 |
| 2 | 500 µg/mL | 55.75222 | 58.84957 | 58.84957 | 57.81712 |
| 3 | 400 µg/mL | 58.84957 | 65.04425 | 59.73452 | 61.20943 |
| 4 | 300 µg/mL | 61.94680 | 60.17698 | 61.06195 | 61.06195 |
| 5 | 200 µg/mL | 63.71681 | 62.83187 | 62.83187 | 63.12683 |
| 6 | 100 µg/mL | 64.15928 | 65.04425 | 65.04425 | 64.74927 |
| 7 | 80 µg/mL | 65.92920 | 71.23893 | 70.79647 | 69.32153 |
| 8 | 60 µg/mL | 70.79647 | 72.12389 | 73.45133 | 72.12388 |
| 9 | 40 µg/mL | 76.10618 | 76.54866 | 77.87611 | 76.84366 |
| 10 | 20 µg/mL | 78.31858 | 78.31857 | 78.76105 | 78.46607 |
| 11 | 10 µg/mL | 79.20354 | 88.49557 | 79.64602 | 82.44837 |
Cell viability (%) of MDA MB 231 cells treated with fossil extract. Percentage cell viability values calculated from 3-(4,5-diemethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium assay optical density measurements relative to untreated control cells. The table demonstrates a concentration-dependent reduction in cell viability following treatment with fossilized Spinosaurus tooth extract
The highest tested concentration (500 µg/mL) produced a marked reduction in cell viability, whereas lower concentrations showed progressively reduced inhibitory effects. GraphPad Prism analysis of the dose–response data yielded an IC50 value of 72.67 µg/mL, indicating notable growth inhibitory activity of the fossil extract against MDAMB-231 cells.
Intracellular ROS generation
DCFH-DA fluorescence staining demonstrated increased intracellular ROS accumulation in treated MDAMB-231 cells compared with untreated controls. The fluorescence pattern indicated enhanced oxidative stress following exposure to the fossil extract. Since excessive ROS accumulation is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative damage, and apoptosis, the ROS findings support the cytotoxicity results observed in the MTT assay.
DISCUSSION
The present study demonstrates that fossilized Spinosaurus tooth material is a chemically and structurally complex biomineral matrix with measurable in vitro anticancer and oxidative stress-related activity against MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells. This represents an unconventional and exploratory attempt to connect paleontological biomineral material with cancer-related cellular assays through an integrated workflow combining FESEM, EDS, ED-XRF, GC-MS, MTT cytotoxicity analysis, and intracellular ROS assessment.
A central finding of the present work is the highly mineralized nature of the fossilized tooth. FESEM-EDS and ED-XRF analyses demonstrated that the fossil matrix contains oxygen-rich phases together with calcium, phosphorus, silicon, iron, magnesium, manganese, carbon, and additional trace elements. This is significant because the biological effects of mineralized materials are often governed not only by their bulk chemistry but also by the redox behavior, ionic release potential, surface charge, porosity, and structural heterogeneity of their mineral phases. Fossilized tooth material is especially interesting in this regard because it originates from a biological template that has been extensively transformed by geological time, potentially yielding a natural hybrid of apatite-derived architecture and sediment-associated mineral chemistry. The bulk elemental profile obtained by ED-XRF analysis is shown in Figure 5, while the trace elemental composition is summarized in Table 4.

| Sr.No. | Component | Result | Unit | Stat. Err. | LLD: Lower Limit of Detection | LLQ: Lower Limit of Quantification | Element line | Intensity(cps/µA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O | 549557 | ppm | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2 | Ca | 165960 | ppm | 324 | 53.3 | 160 | M:Ca-Kα | 15.68493 |
| 3 | Si | 93688 | ppm | 143 | 34.6 | 104 | L:Si-Kα | 69.53283 |
| 4 | P | 87826 | ppm | 85.8 | 32.0 | 95.9 | L:P-Kα | 177.28585 |
| 5 | Fe | 71975 | ppm | 70.0 | 5.24 | 15.7 | M:Fe-Kα | 60.99502 |
| 6 | Al | 10645 | ppm | 90.3 | 101 | 304 | L:Al-Kα | 2.45196 |
| 7 | Ti | 9092 | ppm | 62.7 | 38.8 | 116 | M:Ti-Kα | 1.32520 |
| 8 | S | 4755 | ppm | 16.2 | 14.1 | 42.2 | L:S-Kα | 14.69928 |
| 9 | Cl | 2226 | ppm | 8.54 | 10.1 | 30.3 | L:Cl-Kα | 12.52756 |
| 10 | Mn | 1669 | ppm | 13.9 | 12.8 | 38.5 | M:Mn-Kα | 0.86908 |
| 11 | Y | 1082 | ppm | 1.89 | 0.643 | 1.93 | M:Y-Kα | 19.24266 |
| 12 | Ce | 332 | ppm | 3.35 | 4.41 | 13.2 | H:Ce-Kα | 0.98341 |
| 13 | Sr | 330 | ppm | 1.12 | 0.625 | 1.87 | M:Sr-Kα | 5.08007 |
| 14 | Zr | 243 | ppm | 3.05 | 3.73 | 11.2 | H:Zr-Kα | 0.59305 |
| 15 | Nd | 198 | ppm | 3.36 | 6.45 | 19.3 | H:Nd-Kα | 0.45257 |
| 16 | La | 169 | ppm | 2.51 | 3.99 | 12.0 | H:La-Kα | 0.51894 |
| 17 | Zn | 119 | ppm | 1.56 | 1.57 | 4.71 | M:Zn-Kα | 0.36483 |
| 18 | As | 70.2 | ppm | 0.828 | 1.08 | 3.23 | M:As-Kα | 0.48982 |
| 19 | Sn | 46.2 | ppm | 1.08 | 1.24 | 3.72 | H:Sn-Kα | 0.23844 |
| 20 | Pb | 17.2 | ppm | 1.64 | 4.71 | 14.1 | M:Pb-Lα | 0.06296 |
The table lists the principal, and trace elements present in the fossil matrix and complements the FESEM–EDS surface analysis by confirming the mineralized, calcium phosphate-rich and trace metal-containing nature of the bulk specimen. FESEM–EDS: Field emission scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive spectroscopy, ED-XRF: Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence
Iron appears to be one of the most relevant elements in the context of the observed biological activity. Iron is a redox-active metal capable of cycling between Fe2+ and Fe3+ states and participating in Fenton-type reactions that generate hydroxyl radicals and other ROS.[9,10] In cancer cells, which often already operate under elevated oxidative stress, further ROS generation can overwhelm antioxidant defenses and trigger cell death. Thus, the presence of iron-rich mineral phases in the fossilized tooth may contribute to oxidative stress induction following cellular exposure to the fossil extract or its released components. Similarly, manganese-containing phases may also influence ROS biology and mitochondrial function, as manganese is known to participate in oxidative stress regulation and superoxide dismutase-associated pathways.[11]
Calcium and phosphorus are also important components of the fossil matrix. Phosphorus also warrants separate consideration because, within fossilized vertebrate hard tissues, it is retained predominantly as phosphate in apatite-derived mineral phases rather than as a free elemental constituent. Beyond its structural role, phosphate is relevant to mineral dissolution behavior, ionic exchange, membrane phospholipid organization, ATP-dependent metabolism, and phosphorylation-mediated cellular signaling. Accordingly, a phosphate-rich fossil biomineral may not be biologically inert, but instead may contribute indirectly to cell–material interactions and stress-related responses through its physicochemical behavior. The GC–MS chromatogram of the fossil extract is shown in Table 5.
| Peak | Retention Time | Start Time | End Time | m/z | Area | Area% | Height | Height% | A/H | Mark | Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.061 | 4.005 | 4.746 | TIC | 21083 | 6.44 | 3433 | 2.86 | 3.29 | – | Dimethyl Sulfoxide |
| 2 | 16.101 | 16.03 | 16.175 | TIC | 8197 | 5.11 | 5294 | 4.38 | 1.57 | – | Pentadecane |
| 3 | 31.879 | 31.801 | 32.19 | TIC | 6994 | 2.06 | 3303 | 2.7 | 2.11 | – | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, diisooctyl ester |
| 4 | 32.765 | 32.625 | 33.13 | TIC | 11436 | 4.15 | 5704 | 4.53 | 2.01 | – | 1,4-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis (2-ethylhexyl) ester |
| 5 | 33.36 | 33.03 | 33.82 | TIC | 10387 | 4.06 | 5302 | 2.85 | 3.62 | V | N-(5,6,7,8-Tetrahydro-3,4- phenylsulfonyl…)[unclear] |
| 6 | 34.15 | 34.095 | 34.13 | TIC | 1590 | 0.68 | 2210 | 4.18 | 0.76 | V | Benzenebutanethioic acid, α,α,3,4-pentamethyl-, S-methyl ester |
| 7 | 50.17 | 50.13 | 50.18 | TIC | 2317 | 1.06 | 2026 | 4.66 | 1.29 | V | Benzenebutanethioic acid, α,α,3,4-pentamethyl-, S-methyl ester |
| 8 | 50.345 | 50.26 | 50.655 | TIC | 7318 | 5.06 | 2708 | 2.03 | 3.36 | V | 6-Hydroxy-2-bromodibenzothiophene quinone […] |
| 9 | 53.406 | 53.405 | 53.425 | TIC | 4031 | 1.6 | 3425 | 4.99 | 2.06 | V | 1-Cyclohexene,3-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)- […] |
| 10 | 53.183 | 53.045 | 53.5 | TIC | 2134 | 0.92 | 2550 | 4.92 | 0.84 | V | Benzenebutanethioic acid, α,α,3,4-pentamethyl-, S-methyl ester |
| 11 | 58.653 | 58.58 | 58.66 | TIC | 7853 | 2.92 | 2715 | 1.84 | 3.44 | V | Benzenebutanethioic acid, α,α,3,4-pentamethyl-, S-methyl ester |
| 12 | 59.653 | 59.6 | 59.73 | TIC | 4566 | 1.76 | 2301 | 1.98 | 1.98 | V | Benzenebutanethioic acid, α,α,3,4-pentamethyl-, S-methyl ester |
| 13 | 59.74 | 59.73 | 59.95 | TIC | 2407 | 1.03 | 1300 | 4.98 | 1.86 | V | Ethanone, 1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)- […] |
| 14 | 79.773 | 79.725 | 79.82 | TIC | 3433 | 1.1 | 3208 | 1.8 | 1.29 | V | Benzenebutanethioic acid, α,α,3,4-pentamethyl-, S-methyl ester |
| 15 | 83.889 | 83.835 | 83.95 | TIC | 7781 | 2.89 | 5028 | 4.66 | 3.89 | – | 3-(4-Dimethyl…)-5-hydroxy-4-methyl-5-hexyl-2-furan[…] |
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) profile of compounds present in fossilized Spinosaurus tooth extract. GC-MS chromatogram of the ethanol–water extract prepared from powdered fossilized Spinosaurus tooth. Multiple chromatographic peaks were observed, corresponding to compounds and molecular classes of possible biological relevance, including aromatic ester derivatives, anthraquinone-related compounds, pyrrole-associated compounds, sulfur-containing molecules, piperazine-associated compounds, and iron-associated organometallic species. Although these assignments require cautious interpretation because of the fossil origin of the material, the profile suggests that the extract contains volatile and semi-volatile constituents capable of contributing to redox modulation and cytotoxic activity. V: Validated, TLC: Thin Layer chromatography
In fossilized vertebrate hard tissues, these elements are commonly associated with apatite-derived mineral phases that originate from the original tooth or bone structure. Calcium phosphate-based materials have long been studied in biomaterials science because of their biocompatibility, ion exchange properties, and ability to interact with cellular membranes and intracellular signaling pathways. Disturbance of calcium homeostasis can activate endoplasmic reticulum stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and apoptosis-related cascades in cancer cells.[12,13] Magnesium, another detected element, may influence mineral lattice organization, electrostatic interactions, and membrane-level responses.[14] Silicon-bearing phases may further contribute to the surface complexity and physicochemical behavior of the fossil matrix.
The MTT assay results showed a concentration-dependent cytotoxic effect of the fossil extract on MDA-MB-231 cells, with an IC50 value of 72.67 µg/mL. This finding indicates that the fossil-derived preparation contains components capable of reducing cancer cell viability in vitro. While the exact potency cannot yet be directly compared with conventional chemotherapeutic agents or purified natural products, the result is notable because the test material was not designed pharmaceutical compound but rather an extract derived from a fossilized geological-biological specimen. The cytotoxicity findings suggest that the fossil matrix may contain either bioactive organic residues, redox-active mineral species, or a combination of both capable of interfering with cancer cell survival. The dose–response plot of the MTT assay optical density values is presented in Figure 6. The raw optical density values obtained from the MTT assay are summarized in Table 2.

The ROS fluorescence assay provides mechanistic support for this interpretation. Treated MDA-MB-231 cells displayed increased DCFH-DA fluorescence compared with untreated controls, indicating elevated intracellular ROS levels. Excess ROS is known to damage nucleic acids, membrane lipids, proteins, and mitochondrial components, thereby promoting cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, or necrotic pathways.[20-22] Oxidative stress reflects a pathological imbalance between ROS generation and antioxidant defense, resulting in cumulative biomolecular damage and disease progression. Aruoma highlighted this redox disruption as a central mechanism in cancer and other chronic disorders, while underscoring the protective role of antioxidants in maintaining cellular integrity and reducing oxidative injury.[22]
Cancer cells are particularly vulnerable to ROS overload because many malignancies maintain a high basal oxidative state due to rapid metabolism, mitochondrial stress, and oncogenic signaling. Therefore, materials that further elevate ROS may selectively push cancer cells beyond their oxidative tolerance threshold. The combined MTT and ROS findings in the present study suggest that oxidative stress-mediated cytotoxicity is a plausible component of the fossil extract’s biological effect. The concentration-dependent reduction in cell viability is illustrated in Figure 7, and the corresponding percentage cell viability values are summarized in Table 3. Representative microscopic images of untreated and treated MDA-MB-231 cells are shown in Figure 8.


GC-MS profiling adds another important dimension to the interpretation of the results. The detection of anthraquinone-related molecules, pyrrole derivatives, sulfur-containing compounds, aromatic esters, piperazine-associated compounds, and iron-associated organometallic species suggests that the fossil extract may not behave as a purely inorganic mineral preparation. Anthraquinone derivatives are especially relevant because they are widely recognized in anticancer pharmacology and may act through DNA intercalation, redox cycling, topoisomerase inhibition, and apoptosis induction. Pyrrole and piperazine derivatives have also been reported in medicinal chemistry contexts for their influence on signaling pathways, metabolic activity, and drug-like interactions. Sulfur-containing compounds may modulate redox status and mitochondrial function, while aromatic ester-like molecules may reflect preserved or diagenetically modified organic components associated with the fossil matrix.
Taken together, the elemental and GC MS findings suggest that the biological activity of the fossilized Spinosaurus tooth may arise from a mineral–organic synergistic system rather than from a single isolated factor. This is an important conceptual point. Fossilized materials are not chemically homogeneous; they are products of long-term interaction between original biological tissues and surrounding geochemical environments. Consequently, any observed biological effect is likely to emerge from the combined influence of mineral phases, trace metals, preserved organics, sediment-derived compounds, and extraction-dependent constituents. The fossil extract studied here may therefore be considered a preliminary biomaterial-like composite rather than a conventional purified natural product.
From an interdisciplinary perspective, the study also highlights a broader conceptual bridge between palaeontology and biomedical materials research. Fossils are generally valued for the information they provide about ancient organisms and environments, but their mineralized composition may also make them relevant to geochemistry-driven biological investigation. This does not imply that fossils should be exploited indiscriminately as medicinal resources; fossil specimens are scientifically important and must be treated as part of geological and paleontological heritage. However, carefully designed laboratory studies on authenticated fossil fragments, powdered residues, or non-diagnostic materials may open new questions regarding ancient biomineral chemistry, redox-active geological matrices, and bioinspired mineral composites. The calculated IC50 value and dose–response parameters are presented in Table 6. Representative intracellular ROS fluorescence images are presented in Figure 9. The quantitative analysis of intracellular ROS generation is shown in Figure 10.
| Parameter | Description (Legend) | Value |
|---|---|---|
| IC50 of fossilized Spinosaurus tooth extract | Concentration of the extract required to inhibit 50% of MDA-MB-231 cell viability. | 72.67 μg/mL |
| Regression model | Dose–response curve was fitted using the GraphPad Prism log (inhibitor) versus normalized response variable-slope (four-parameter logistic) model. | Variable-slope 4PL model |
| Log IC50 | Logarithm (base 10) of the IC50 value estimated from the fitted regression model. | 1.862 |
| Hill slope | Slope of the fitted dose–response curve indicating the steepness of the inhibitory response. | −1.536 |
| Standard error of Log IC50 | Standard error associated with the estimated Log IC50 value. | 0.03052 |
| Standard error of Hill slope | Standard error associated with the estimated Hill slope. | 0.1703 |
| 95% confidence interval of Log IC50 | Range within which the true Log IC50 value is expected to lie with 95% confidence. | 1.799–1.923 |
| 95% confidence interval of Hill slope | Range within which the true Hill slope is expected to lie with 95% confidence. | −1.886 to−1.187 |
| 95% confidence interval of IC50 | Estimated range of the true IC50 value with 95% confidence. | 62.93–83.92 µg/mL |
| Degrees of freedom | Number of independent observations used in estimating the regression error. | 27 |
| Coefficient of determination (R2) | Indicates how well the regression model fits the experimental data. | 0.9226 |
| Absolute sum of squares | Total squared residual error between the observed and fitted values. | 2600 |
| Sy.x | Standard deviation of the residuals (standard error of the regression). | 9.635 |
| Replicates (n) | Number of independent experimental replicates performed. | 3 |
| Data points analysed | Total number of observations included in the dose–response curve fitting. | 30 |
GraphPad Prism-derived dose–response regression parameters for the cytotoxic activity of fossilized Spinosaurus tooth extract against MDA-MB-231 cells. The IC50 value (72.67 µg/mL) was calculated using a log (inhibitor) versus normalized response variable-slope (four-parameter logistic) regression model. The table summarizes the fitted regression parameters (Log IC50 and Hill slope), their standard errors, 95% confidence intervals, goodness-of-fit statistics (degrees of freedom, R2, absolute sum of squares, and Sy.x), and the number of experimental replicates and data points included in the analysis.


The present study nevertheless has several limitations that must be acknowledged clearly. First, the biological evaluation was restricted to a single cancer cell line, MDA MB 231. No normal mammalian cell line was included to determine whether the fossil extract exhibits selective toxicity toward cancer cells. Second, the study did not quantify apoptosis markers such as caspase activation, Annexin V staining, mitochondrial membrane depolarization, or DNA fragmentation. Third, the antioxidant-related claim in the title should be interpreted carefully: although ROS modulation was assessed, the current data mainly support oxidative stress induction in cancer cells rather than classical antioxidant activity measured by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH); 2,2'-Azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power or related free-radical scavenging assays. If the journal or reviewers request stricter evidence for “antioxidant” activity, the title or discussion may need to clarify that the work addresses oxidative stress modulation rather than direct antioxidant capacity. Fourth, GC-MS identification of compounds in a fossil extract must be interpreted cautiously because contaminants, environmental organics, storage-associated compounds, or extraction artifacts cannot be ruled out without confirmatory analyses.
Future work should therefore focus on expanding the biological and chemical characterization of the fossil-derived material. Important next steps include testing against additional cancer cell lines and non-cancerous cells, evaluating apoptosis and cell-cycle markers, measuring mitochondrial membrane potential, quantifying oxidative stress biomarkers, and isolating active fractions through chromatographic purification. Advanced elemental mapping, X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/MS could further clarify the mineral and molecular composition of the fossil matrix. If reproducible activity is confirmed, the fossilized Spinosaurus tooth may serve not only as a direct therapeutic material but as an inspiration for designing synthetic or bioinspired mineral composites that mimic its redox-active and biomineral characteristics.[23]
A final conceptual point concerns the broader ecological and translational implications of fossil-bearing mineral environments. Fossil-rich terrains are often associated with mineral-enriched substrates, and such environments may influence the chemistry of surrounding sediments and potentially the phytochemical profile of medicinal plants growing nearby. Although this idea was not experimentally examined in the present study, it suggests an interesting future direction linking palaeontology, geochemistry, medicinal plant science, environmental biotechnology, and biomaterials research. Such ideas, however, must remain secondary to conservation priorities, and any future work in this area should be conducted within strict ethical and geological preservation frameworks.
Overall, the present results indicate that fossilized Spinosaurus tooth material is more than a paleontological curiosity. It is a diagenetically transformed mineralized composite with measurable in vitro biological effects and with sufficient chemical complexity to justify further investigation. The study does not claim that fossils are established anticancer agents, but it does propose that ancient biomineral systems may offer new inspiration for interdisciplinary research at the interface of geology, palaeontology, chemistry, and cancer biology.
CONCLUSION
The present study demonstrates that fossilized Spinosaurus tooth material possesses significance extending beyond conventional paleontological interpretation and may have preliminary relevance in anticancer and oxidative stress-related biomedical research. FESEM, EDS, and EDXRF analyses revealed that the fossilized tooth is a highly mineralized composite enriched with oxygen, calcium, phosphorus, silicon, iron, magnesium, manganese, carbon, and other trace elements. GC–MS profiling further identified multiple extractable compounds associated with chemical classes previously linked to oxidative stress modulation and cytotoxic activity.
Biological evaluation against MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells showed concentration-dependent cytotoxicity with an IC50 value of 72.67 µg/mL, while intracellular ROS analysis demonstrated increased oxidative stress in treated cells. Together, these findings suggest that fossil-derived mineral–organic matrices may influence cancer cell viability through ROS-associated and apoptosis-related mechanisms.
Although the present findings remain preliminary and require additional mechanistic, toxicological, and in vivo validation, they establish an interdisciplinary basis for exploring fossil-derived biomineral materials in cancer-related research. The fossilized Spinosaurus tooth may therefore be viewed not only as a remnant of prehistoric life but also as a scientifically intriguing mineralized composite capable of inspiring future studies in geochemistry, biomaterials science, oxidative stress biology, and anticancer therapeutics.
Acknowledgment:
The author would like to express sincere appreciation to Fossil Era and Mr. Matt Heaton, CEO, for providing the fossilized Spinosaurus tooth specimen together with an authenticity certificate. Their support and cooperation were invaluable in enabling the present investigation. The author sincerely acknowledges Dr. Okezie I. Aruoma, Editor of AJBPS, and the editorial team for their valuable guidance in helping frame and refines the manuscript into a more suitable form for publication.
Ethical approval:
Institutional Ethics Committee approval was not required as the study was performed exclusively using the established human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231, originally procured from the National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune, India, and obtained through Trichy Research Institute of Biotechnology Pvt. Ltd., Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India. No human participants, human tissues, or live animals were involved in this study.
Declaration of patient consent:
Patient’s consent is not required as there are no patients in this study.
Conflicts of interest:
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
References
- Semiaquatic adaptations in a giant predatory dinosaur. Science. 2014;345:1613-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Predicting the effects of skeletal geometry of extinct taxa on locomotion: A sensitivity analysis. J Vertebr Paleontol. 2015;35:e904323.
- [Google Scholar]
- Oxygen isotope evidence for semi-aquatic habits among spinosaurid theropods. Geology. 2010;38:139-42.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A comparison of eggshell porosity and water-vapor conductance in extant birds and dinosaurs. Can J Earth Sci. 2010;47:1227-37.
- [Google Scholar]
- Basal tetanurae In: Weishampel DB, Dodson P, Osmólska H, eds. The Dinosauria (2nd ed). Berkeley: University of California Press; 2004. p. :71-110.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ontogeny and the fossil record: What, if anything, is an adult dinosaur? Biolo Lett. 2016;12:20150947.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Exceptional soft-tissue preservation in a theropod dinosaur from Italy. Nature. 1998;392:383-7.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Basal abelisaurid and carcharodontosaurid theropods from the lower cretaceous Elrhaz formation of Niger. Acta Palaeontol Pol. 2008;53:15-46.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Recent advances in iron complexes as potential anticancer agents. New J Chem. 2016;40:1063-1090.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Targeting cancer by binding iron: Dissecting cellular signaling pathways. Oncotarget. 2015;6:18748-79.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manganese superoxide dismutase and cancer. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;20:1628-45.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Calcium and cancer: Targeting Ca2+ transport. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:519-30.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Targeting calcium signaling in cancer therapy. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2017;7:3-17.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- From magnesium to magnesium transporters in cancer: TRPM7, a novel signature in tumour development. Magnes Res. 2013;26:149-55.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dysregulation of Mg2+ homeostasis contributes to acquisition of cancer hallmarks. Cell Calcium. 2019;83:102078.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65:55-63.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A critical assessment of the use of microculture tetrazolium assays to measure cell growth and function. Growth Regul. 1995;5:69-84.
- [Google Scholar]
- Detection of total reactive oxygen species in adherent cells by 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate staining. J Vis Exp. 2020;160:e60682.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dichloro-dihydro-fluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) assay: A quantitative method for oxidative stress assessment of nanoparticle-treated cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 2013;27:954-63.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ROS-modulated therapeutic approaches in cancer treatment. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143:1789-809.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reactive oxygen species in redox cancer therapy. Cancer Lett. 2015;367:18-25.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Free radicals, oxidative stress, and antioxidants in human health and disease. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1998;75:199-212.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pharmacotherapeutic potential of Spinosaurus tooth fossils; Discovering the ancient healer. Am J Biopharm Sci. 2026;10:1-11.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

